I was at the oswego harborfest website and it mentions you should try find lodging inside the city to fully experience all the activities. I imagine the hotels and motels will be full (and pricey) so I checked airbnb and found no Oswego listings. I can only imagine Oswego doesn't know about airbnb. So being a nosey-parker upstart, I'm giving Oswego a heads-up. I just want to mention that for those of you in Oswego who have spare rooms or an empty apartment during Harborfest--you could make a few $ renting it out using airbnb.com. NO this is not an ad, I just discovered airbnb a few months back and have used it twice so far and loved it. You can use airbnb pretty much everywhere in the world (I used it to go to Montreal. I chose a really nice apartment in montreal, they'd left food in the fridge and they had wifi and cable tv and a huge dining room and two bedrooms, so my whole family stayed the weekend and chilled out for $75 a day). A hotel would have cost a fortune for all of us. The lady who rents it out using airbnb had two apartments in the building, one she lives in and the other she rents using airbnb. College students rent out their apartments during the summer while they're away. Urban professionals who travel a good deal on business rent out their lofts and homes the same way  It also helps people pay their mortgages by adding a little extra income. People rent out their houseboats, cottages, campers, shacks--you name it.  I'm not gaining anything by posting this, I'm just sharing my find with you all. Carol in Scriba

"Oh, now any proof of conservative baffoonery (sic) is fiction to you doc?" 

I simply pointed out that there are at least two ways to look at the information provided and demonstrated that the sycophantic ObamaMedia filters what they report through their progressive "colored" lenses. If they cannot manipulate the information to suit their agenda they ignore it, burying it as deep as they can in the hope that it never sees the light of day. If that information happens to reappear it is usually ridiculed as "old," "irrelevant" or otherwise useless information that has no relationship to the present.

Thank you for making my job easier. Your typical progressive attitude and inability to take criticism substantiate my thesis quite nicely. Keep up the good work as you make my job much easier. As I've said many times I will be here as long as it suits me, not you. So, knock off your fanciful demands that I stop doing what I enjoy doing so much. Your hopes and wishes will not be soon realized.

Doc Bill

off your fat a$$ and off the computer,

and go ask.

I have been otherwise occupied of late and will not be able to refute your progressive conspiracy theories all at once nor in consecutive days. I am sure it took you quite a bit of time to dig out these 20 issues or maybe you just cut and pasted them like you progressives accuse me. Anyway, here we go with the first few.

1. Again, you progressives are stuck in the past with this issue. Maybe you should learn to live with it since it is now long over. First of all you forget that the ballots were developed by democrats and the biggest problems occurred in democrat controlled counties. Also, the laws governing elections in Florida were largely enacted by previous democrat administrations. However, with the 2000 election Al Gore ran out of time as a result of his trying to finesse the counts in very specific, democrat counties. Gore ran out of time and the individual who was empowered with making the decision to follow the law or not decided to follow the law. We do know that democrats follow the laws when it suits them but change the rule when it does not.

For example, not too long ago a democrat candidate, in New Jersey I believe, died before the election. Unfortunately he died AFTER the deadline no pun intended, for changing the ballots and dead people could not be elected. However, a democrat judge decided that there had to be a contest and allowed the democrats to put another on the ballot and this new individual actually won. Now, I do not doubt that had this been a Republican conundrum the democrat judge would have followed the law to the letter and disallowed the new candidate. Can I prove it, of course not, but considering all the other things that I've seen happen in such situations I am 100% confident that the Republicans would have lost.

In spite of all of this, various news organizations continued the count long after the issue was decided by the US Supreme Court. No matter how they did the count AL GORE NEVER HAD ENOUGH VBOTES TO WIN. Since that isn't the outcome your sources want they tend to ignore the reality of the situation and leave that little fact out.

2. Reality gives you a bite on the ass with this one. Sure, Bush kept us out of Kyoto and thank Bush for doing so. Kyoto was developed with the strict intent of punishing First World Countries and especially the United States with onerous rules, limits, fees and taxes that were designed to reduce our economic impact in the world. Those who signed up for it have learned the hard way that this is one of the most destructive agreements anyone could be a part of unless you are one of those countries who were give a POLLUTION FREE PASS to pollute to your heart's content. The result is that most of the countries who discovered to their chagrin that they made a mistake in the first place have backed out of this disaster. Kyoto is dead so learn to live with it. In any event, Obama is destroying our economy without Kyoto so you should be very happy about that.

3. You forget that, thanks to democrats and especially democrat operative Gorelick, there was no communication between and among the various investigative organizations tasked with protecting the American people. She actually built the "WALL" between and among all these organizations. Since they didn't talk to each other no one was able to connect the dots and prevent 9/11. Now history has repeated itself since it is apparent that none of these organizations had their separate acts together and didn't keep the others informed and some islamofascists bombed the Boston marathon, killing 4, including the murdered police officer. and wounding nearly 300 others.

You also forget that it was Clinton who refused to take bin Laden on three separate occasions when other countries tried to hand him over to the US on a platter. Trying to blame this on Bush under these cir-*****stances is fanciful thin king at best. This has all been explained several times in the past by me and others. However, once you progressives get a bug such as this in your brain you just cannot let it go no matter how much proof against you there is.

4. I have spoken of the drug war on a number of occasions and have stated that we are not handling this in the best way possible. We are in the midsts of a drug war and are making the same mistake that were made during prohibition. However, I do not favor just opening this up as some want. There has to be some government hand in this as much as I distrust the government. 

I can envision something along the line of having physicians prescribe the various drugs which can be purchased at a pharmacy. The government would control the prices so that they will remain affordable for all. That, of course, is just a rough outline and not meant to answer all of the questions anyone might have regarding the actual implementation of such a program. The overall negative effects of this drug war outweigh the negative affects on those who are addicted. With such a program it may even be easier to get people "sober". There is some indication that I read about some years ago that addicts can "live with their disease" if they use "clean" drugs in prescribed way that minimize the deleterious effect on them. To a certain extent, addicts can return as productive members of society when the "withdrawal/high" syndrome is controlled. In addition, the cost to others who are the victims of drug uses committing crimes will be significantly reduced.

if, however, your statement is an attempt to put a racist label on Bush or anyone else because of this problem you are barking up the wrong tree. The fact that minorities are overwhelmingly involved in the illegal drug trade is the fault of the "RACE-BAITING POVERTY PIMPS" that refuse to acknowledge reality and by themselves do not want to solve the problem as that would put them out of business. Without these people in prison, addicted to drugs, addicted to government stipends for this and that and all the rest Jackson and the rest of his bunch would have to get real jobs. Those minorities who try to become educated, employed, etc. are attacked for "acting white." Those most negatively affected by drug addiction are minorities and those most often victimized by addicts seeking funds are minorities.

To be continued-

Doc Bill

Sure, only one in ten million read what I write which is why the ObamaMedia is doing so well compared to Fox. OOPS, it's really the other way around. Hardly anyone watches the partisan, democrat operative sycophants in the ObamaMedia who try to pass themselves off as journalists. Most people in the country watch Fox where they get the real news and not some democrat operative's opinion or some twisted poll designed to get the approved responses or totally fabricated garbage that is dressed up to look like news.

Now, about your ObamaMedia sources. It turns out that the vast majority of people are getting their information from that dreaded Fox News. I also read the the evil Koch brothers are looking to by newspapers and other media to the terror of progressives. I hope they do because the progressives news sources are dying. CNN, MSNBC and the rest of the progressive, ObamaMedia are losing so many viewers and readers that they are becoming the fanatic sites where progressives get their news. 

Too bad, you progressives remind me of the brain dead North Koreans repeating in synch the paryt lines about their great father, magnificent leader and all the other crap that any thinking person would reject. Of course rejecting that in North Korea gets you put into the gulag where you are worked to death if you are not experimented on first or shot for breaking one of their rules. 

Still, in the end you have not done a damned thing about countering my points with those of your own. As is typical of you progressives your whole argument is about me and not about the issues I'm talking about. COME ON, grow a pair and put your facts and proof pout there for debate. If you do not then you are just a coward as are all the others I have challenged time and again over these years. Take up the challenge or be quiet.

Doc Bill